RedTailHawk
· 18w
Good stuff. She definitely knows way more about the archetypical aspects of astrology than me. I'm at best a sophomore level astrologer. What I do have that she doesn't seem to have is a physical mode...
Sure thing, glad you found it interesting. And yea, it'd be cool to see a synthesis out of the two of your methods. I can't say I have a huge modern scientific background with things but I did spend a lot of time reading the corpus of Aleister Crowley some of his associates in the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, and prior to that a fair few yogic texts in high school, and can certainly appreciate the notion of sciences that are just hard to get observations for in our modern paradigm (though we do seem to be getting there as you've pointed out).
I've always sort of imagined that there's a fractal structure that I can't quite put my finger on that would make astrology make a lot more sense if only I could detail it. Sort of in the vein of "as above, so below" and "the khabs is in the khu, not the khu in the khabs." Always imagined that it probably aligns well enough with a string/M theory approach but again, physical sciences aren't really my strong suit, so just going on what is probably some amusing pop science in my framework.