Damus
Dathon Ohm · 15w
After much discussion and consideration, I have decided to remove the reactive deployment method and the legal/moral motivations from the BIP document. I still think those things are important and th...
Luke Dashjr profile picture
The whole concept (as I originally designed it) was for an emergency/reactive UASF. I'm not sure it makes sense any other way. For a non-eventful softfork, you'd want to start it 1-1.5 years into the future. And then with a 1 year expiry still?
2❤️6❤️2👍1🤙1
nonymous · 14w
Why not separating both? 1.- Reactive/emergency UASF and 2.- UASF planned 1y ahead but permanent, not temporary. I think Emergency UASF will have way less consensus around it and when/if the offending block happens IMO it will generate a split chain. The chain with the offending block will be consid...
Dathon Ohm · 14w
I think it is less urgent than "emergency", but more urgent than something we should wait 18 months to do.