Damus
Naked Nomad · 6w
Media servers that we know of won't let us upload anymore, and zaps hardly ever come in. Instead its just horny dudes with no tact sending DMs. I think we're done here, its becoming too much work that...
codonaft profile picture
I find it ironic to read that using the censorship-resistant protocol 🌚

#devstr

At some point it was expected to see nsfw here: the protocol specs even mention nsfw/content-warning tags as examples. Yet due to repetitive irresponsible Blossom servers use, it seems like nobody's currently willing to maintain them, specifically for nsfw. Or due to related political age verification cringe, for example: this may affect hosting providers / domain registrars at some point, suddenly requiring KYC from blossom admins as a result, if not worse. DCMA takedown letters are a risk as well. Or it's due to whatever other moral reasons too, I dunno.

I guess some of us believe that we shouldn't focus on this content right now, that this stuff should go last. Soft erotic nsfw possibly acceptable to many here, though. To me personally, if whatever legal nsfw content is properly distinguishable with the nsfw tag—this still should be okay. Whoever who specifically produces original legal content and publishes their nostr events with the tag could run a blossom server for themselves and for likely minded people; nobody can technically disallow that here. Some small fee from producers will also make it reasonable to maintain the server.

> dudes with no tact sending DMs

DMs probably not worth reading here right now for this purpose. I've seen pronouns/gender spec proposals, and I think it's useful here: an nsfw-oriented client could have ignored all DMs from those who didn't set their pronouns or have an irrelevant one. As well as disallow sending any DMs until the pronoun is not yet set. As well as adding the proper nsfw/content-warning tag on every event (both public and the DMs even) and ignoring all non-nsfw events (which will be simultaneously an incentive to not publish events without the appropriate tag at all). WoT and whatever would help too but they are ironically almost empty of those who'd want to send such DMs (which is not necessary a bad thing).

If we stop fighting this stuff and transform it properly, those who don't want nsfw content will see it less often as a result. I think it's a win-win.
41💜1
codonaft · 5w
Filling out a profile page with the appropriate DM rules may decrease drama as well. Even though many will possibly ignore these right now, in an nsfw-only client these could be shown right in the DM screen, and the Send button could be disabled until the user explicitly clicks the "I've read the p...
fiatjaf · 1w
I read this note and https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/issues/2500, which I assume are related. I'm still confused about what you're proposing. What is the basic idea in one sentence? (It doesn't help that I can't see the note you're replying to, and I'm not sure I want to do that.)
FreedomTech · 1w
Bittorrent has dealt with this NSFW stuff for decades, so I imagine Nostr will follow the same path.