Damus
Fat_β‚Ώank$t€r · 3d
And about that C02 thingy, that's just a blessing for life on earth, not the apocalyptic scientific hoax many believe it is.
freemymind πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ profile picture
Great you quote Max. I really appreciate his work. This guy does a lot good work, to renew and popularize austrian economics.

But to the carbon dioxide. It is quiet simple. It is not hard to proof, that CO2 molecules create a greenhouse effect in our atmosphere.

Means that a little more energy of the sun will be circled within the atmosphere of earth. This makes temperatures rise all over the world. And since life is only possible within a very small window of temperatures, a general rise of temperatures will push our world out of todays balance.

Already today we have deserts around the ecuator. There is almost no opportunity for life. When temperature rises, these deserts will grow. This means there will be less available space on earth, where life is possible.

Where within my description there is a false claim?
1
Dependable Independent · 3d
Well I'm not sure how much do you know about the rear earth minerals processing plants, but I'm still not convinced that the CO2 emissions are worse than the toxic waste of these plants. So if the waste of nuclear energy is harmful, the waste of internal combustion engine is harmful and the waste o...
Fat_β‚Ώank$t€r · 3d
When did i say CO2 isn't a greenhouse gas? That's the thing about it. Earth would be unhabitable without it. Its the core biological molecule for photosynthesis so suns energy can be captured. Earth is actually in a CO2 famine and the added CO2 seems to have more measured benefits like more crops...