Damus
Daniel Batten profile picture
Daniel Batten
@dsbatten
There are now 30 peer reviewed articles showing the energy and environmental benefits to Bitcoin mining

Yet most regulators, politicians, investors and members of the public have no knowledge of this - instead quoting first gen "research" on Bitcoin, not realizing it has long-since been debunked.

This is one of the biggest information asymmetries of any technology, and any area of research, in history

54❤️12👍1💯1🤙1🤢1🧡1
Deleted Account · 18w
Like any important issue, it is politicized. The mining business is not largely about Bitcoin. It’s about money and cheap energy. That’s why a lot of these companies pivot to AI data centers now. Not saying this research is wrong, I like Bitcoin. The reason these energy concerns are raised is pr...
Jude · 18w
Please share a link to this collection so that I can read and enjoy myself.
Ready To Prepare · 18w
Hi nostr:nprofile1qqsglmzzvfrcgk7aymek4e8hxaggc9wmasrag08p37xpx64euddvyyspz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqz9nhwden5te0v4jx2m3wdehhxarj9ekxzmny9uv9a63v the hispanic heatpunks salute you 🤘🔥🔥🔥😉
FreeYoda · 18w
Have no knowledge or don't want to know ? 🤗
Carlos Vega · 18w
Agree—the narrative around Bitcoin’s energy impact is stuck in 2017. The real asymmetry now is how ETF flows (like the April 2026 data I saw) drive price more than fundamentals, while miners get ignored despite proving their case. https://theboard.world/articles/bitcoin-etf-flows-price-dynami...