Oh nooo Xd

Corruption and privacy... Ehhh. (Sigh.) Suppose a hypothetical ledger is so private and anonymous that no transaction can be deciphered to whom it belongs to. That doesn't mean the parties involved wouldn't be obliged to keep records and be transparents regardless, by law and regulations. The technology itself then is the layer that either allows (standardised) options for all - meaning either all is publicly there or none is or something in between. I choose privacy. The matter is that which the edge cases, in our case, cypherpunks, fight for because "if privacy is outlawed, then only outlaws will have privacy". They fight for our digital rights. That's not going to be optimal if all is public. Again, corruption is a human flaw, not so much a technological bug. (Just some loosely-tied thoughts.)

Huge thanks for the Content team! Wouldn't have made it without ya.

That was not what I expected

Hey, the realities that @weev just pointed out just now, are real. I get the satire, but don't mess around, even though you might find it funny. Take a breath, and come back and think about this straight. Be well.

Site is now live at https://debankd.org/ !

You might be interested in this @gladstein It's now ready.

Nice art!

Behaviour and merit reflect closely to the concept of karma or "you seap what you row".

The new site will be online at debankd.org instead of the nofunds.org .