Damus
Turtlesallthewaydown⚡️ profile picture
Turtlesallthewaydown⚡️
@Turtlesallthewaydown⚡️

#exclusivelyBitcoin #onlyonNostr

# !/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)

Relays (11)
  • wss://nostr-relay.wlvs.space – read & write
  • wss://nostr.oxtr.dev – read & write
  • wss://nostr.orangepill.dev – read & write
  • wss://eden.nostr.land – read & write
  • wss://nostr.fmt.wiz.biz – read & write
  • wss://relay.snort.social – read & write
  • wss://relay.current.fyi – read & write
  • wss://nos.lol – read & write
  • wss://brb.io – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io – read & write
  • wss://wss//nostr.mineracks. – read & write

Recent Notes

Jeff Booth · 7w
Really excited for the launch of Orange Juice today. Been working on this for over a year and think it’s going to be a great way to bring Bitcoin to main street. https://jeffreybooth.com/articles...
Turtlesallthewaydown⚡️ profile picture
Hey Jeff,

So I’ve been thinking about this for a while… not Orange Juice specifically but instead the paradigm shift for what a successful business might look like on a Bitcoin standard.

More specifically the idea that if the goods/services a company offers are paid for in a money that is not melting then value and quality return.

If the money we exchange holds or gains in purchasing power year on year then planned obsolescence of goods becomes economically unnecessary for a company to stay in business. Heralding in the return of products that are guaranteed to last a lifetime and the economical feasibility of offering excellent and ongoing after sales service.

More specifically, I’m looking forward to Orange Juice starting or buying a company that produce a washing machine designed to last for 50years. We’ve had the capability to do this for more than 100years. My Great Grandmother used the same washing machine that she bought as a newly wed (in her twenties) until the day she died at 99years of age. It was one of those ones with the manual rollers on top that used to squeeze the water out of the clothes.

I’m sure I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already been thinking about. I’m excited for the renaissance of quality.
JWAY · 4w
I’m one of those 12 word proponents. We can discuss IRL but look into the full systems’ entropy. SHA-256’s real collision security is 2^128. Pilling more entropy into the private key doesn’t...
Turtlesallthewaydown⚡️ profile picture
Does this hold true under quantum? Yes, I understand the FUD that quantum computing currently is however let’s suspend that reality for a moment…

Say we wake up tmw and quantum computing has been solved. You’ve got a 128bit seed and I’ve got a 256bit seed… is one of us in an urgent rush to upgrade their set up and the other calmly going about their day? Or are both of us in the same predicament because of SHA-256 real collision security?
1
JWAY · 4w
As I understand it ECDSA is broken by Quantum, not weakened. One can derive the private key from the public regardless of how much entropy you’ve included within the private key.
JWAY · 4w
I’m one of those 12 word proponents. We can discuss IRL but look into the full systems’ entropy. SHA-256’s real collision security is 2^128. Pilling more entropy into the private key doesn’t...
Turtlesallthewaydown⚡️ profile picture
I’ve been a 12 word proponent until now, based on a ‘trust me bro’ understanding. … maybe it is my lack of understanding in the difference between 258bit entropy and SHA-256 real collision security. I’ll look into it. 👍
JWAY · 4w
lol…. I truly do not understand. Maybe they’ve never tried?
Turtlesallthewaydown⚡️ profile picture
These are people that have tried and have created their own entropy using dice, pills or cards.

Maybe they don’t understand that when they sit as a ‘panel of experts’ in front of an audience… the 12 years of indoctrination most of us have been subjected to, teaches us to outsource our trust and thinking to them.

Maybe they don’t understand that 24words is orders of magnitude greater than 12words. As I’m also sick of hearing there is practically no benefit in 24words over 12words and 12words is ‘good enough’. This maybe true in a multisig as an attacker needs 24words (2 x 12) but in a single sig 24words is quantum resistant and 12words is not.

12 words plus quantum is theorised to make the 128bit entropy as hackable 64bit entropy is now. Difficult but not impossible.

Apologies for the rant, feeling a bit frustrated over the shared opinions from last night… which if followed lands noobs straight back in the “don’t verify, trust” paradigm. Screw that! How’s that working out for the world?
1
JWAY · 4w
I’m one of those 12 word proponents. We can discuss IRL but look into the full systems’ entropy. SHA-256’s real collision security is 2^128. Pilling more entropy into the private key doesn’t change the lower bound of the system. All that said, there is no ‘right way’ if 24 makes you ...
Turtlesallthewaydown⚡️ profile picture
Don’t let a firmware dictate your fate,
Roll your own dice before it’s too late.
If the device makes the seed alone,
The coins you hold are not your own.

It’s time to meme this into everyone’s consciousness.

I’m still pissed, I was at a Bitcoin meetup last night, within a week of the ColdCard fuck up and I sat their completely flawed as some excellent humans and Bitcoiners told the audience: ‘moving forward, it is ‘probably ok’ to trust device generated entropy’. Their rationale: “expecting new people to roll their own entropy was too much inconvenience and would not scale to 8 billion people”. I understand their point. However, what happened to, “Don’t trust, verify”?

I’m not sure about anyone else, but I definitely did not get into Bitcoin for its ‘convenience’.

I’m gobsmacked to have to ask, after the week we’ve just had, “Did we learn nothing?”

If you are securing meaningful amounts of your life energy in Bitcoin, please take 10 minutes of your time, to generate your own random seed phrase. The months, years or decades of stored energy you are securing is worth 10minutes of your focused attention.
8
JWAY · 4w
lol…. I truly do not understand. Maybe they’ve never tried?
Rangeman · 4w
did a seed on CC with new FW Confirmed on 3 different sites and all matched should i worry?
Michael Dunworth · 11w
Pete always has pearls of wisdom! He’s got the best economic finance brain 10/10 would swap! Haha, it was a great episode!
Turtlesallthewaydown⚡️ profile picture
Hey Michael, you did reply, twice.

Yeah, Pete is great however, as would be expected from his chosen career, everything I’ve heard him say feels strongly based in his fiat paradigm.

Not a criticism… it’s extremely hard to extract oneself from our existing paradigms… particularly those paradigms shared by the people around us.

It’s going to be awesome weather in Palm Cove this weekend. Sunny and 26 degrees. Are you heading up for the bush bash?
ChartsBTC · 7w
#Bitcoin supply by halving epoch: Epoch 0: 2.41M BTC Epoch 1: 1.14M BTC Epoch 2: 2.05M BTC Epoch 3: 3.88M BTC Epoch 4: 10.59M BTC Data as of 2026-07-16 #Bitcoin $BTC #HODL #Halving #BitcoinChartBot h...
Turtlesallthewaydown⚡️ profile picture
Hi, apologies if this question is asinine but can you please explain the decline in supply from Epoch 0 to Epoch 1 and what exactly is Epoch 0?

If I’m interpreting correctly you are suggesting a 2.41M pre-mine?
Or are you referring to ‘available supply’ not total supply?
1
Brendio · 7w
My interpretation of the graph is that it is showing Bitcoin supply by epoch in which it last moved I.e. utxo age. So 2.41 M of the 10.5M Epoch 0 BTC supply has not moved since the first halving.
Michael Dunworth · 11w
Pete always has pearls of wisdom! He’s got the best economic finance brain 10/10 would swap! Haha, it was a great episode!
Michael Dunworth · 11w
I thought I replied, but Oete always has pearls of wisdom! Best finance economy brain ever! 10/10 would want! Thought it was a great episode! 🤙