@nprofile1q... "It's all corrupt" is a description, and it is accurate. Normal people generally agree on descriptions.
Prescriptions is where opinions diverge, and as you noticed, various people have various prescriptions to solve the same problem. E.g. people like you want to fight corruption, others want to ignore it.
I can live in a world where people agree on descriptions and disagree on prescriptions. What is getting at me, more than about anything else, is when some people (typically, but not only, Republican politicians) start to fight descriptions by negating reality in an attempt to gaslight everyone, because they know their prescriptions are so horrendous that nobody would agree with them and their only chance is to maximize confusion by making the whole notion of truth irrelevant. That is the most epistemologically evil thing I can envision.