Slipstream absolutely was an attack on the network, but it was only possible because the filler was only applied in policy, not in consensus.

Bip110 would reject blocks containing transactions from slipstream.

Core v30 didn't fix anything, it just opened the door for abuse wider.

This is a disingenuous argument, BIP110 does more than restore the op_return filter, it also fixes the taproot inscriptions fiasco and several other things.

I did an analysis of my own, and found that BIP110 would have saved the blockchain from 650mb of garbage in January.

Are we forgetting that OpenAI themselves used to be a non-profit foundation too? I don't really trust their concept of a "foundation"

Illegal material in the chain *is* an attack vector. Even if node runners aren't liable, the reputation of Bitcoin goes down the drain, just like BSV when they got flooded with it.

You'd understand if you ever try to post anything contrary to the Core dogma on the dev email list or on the core git repo.

All the core devs do is flag your post as "off topic", then they unblock it long enough to ridicule you, then they freeze it again.

You can't be a Core supporter without blocking everyone else. Core Devs do it, so the worshippers need to as well

Hah, I was just about to say the same thing.

I only wish the core devs could extend the same olive branch.

Good luck, mate

You have a very fucked up view of what content control is.

Please enlighten me, what limits are currently preventing a transaction from consuming an entire block? (And therefore selfishly congesting the network)

BIP110 makes it so you have to pay MORE fees for storing more data, making it MORE fair to people who actually want to move money instead of store porn.

Yes nostr is a communication protocol, so they chose caps that are appropriate for communication.

Bitcoin needs caps appropriate for monetary transactions.. are you saying that while one protocol needs caps, another protocol should have none at all?

Have you ever written code before?

Nostr has a 64 kb cap on text, are they censoring you?

Bip110 is completely agnostic to whatever data flows through the network, it simply puts a cap on the size to prevent abuse.

Real engineering puts guardrails in rather than telling everyone that a legitimate use for the building they designed is to burn it down

A global service that needs to live in personal computers.

If you want to store the entire Encyclopedia somewhere, use Dropbox, not the world's perfect money.