@Kruw
Taxes are a scam. Inflation is a stealth tax. Bitcoin fixes this.
Relays (2)
- wss://relay.primal.net/ – write
- wss://relay.damus.io/ – write
Recent Notes
That is not a given, the reciever can obviously include fees in their input. I don't why you feel like you can talk to me like a whiney little cunt but, it's becoming pretty annoying, especially since...
No, this is Nostr, so I don't have to shut up about you being wrong.
Payjoins are larger than normal transactions, get over it.
Payjoins are larger than normal transactions, get over it.
Dude, I'm not going to argue with you suffice it to say, that's not how it works. This is not an inclient function this is a coordinated out-of-band operation. You don't just get to "set your fees." G...
I just explained how your design lets a payjoin sender could drain the receiver's wallet. Do some research before spreading misinformation:
"In exchange for the privacy benefit, the sender has to pay more fees than a normal transaction. It is a con for the sender, but a pro for the receiver, since the receiver does not have to consolidate its coin later." - @nopara73 (coinventor of payjoin)
https://nopara73.medium.com/pay-to-endpoint-56eb05d3cac6
"In exchange for the privacy benefit, the sender has to pay more fees than a normal transaction. It is a con for the sender, but a pro for the receiver, since the receiver does not have to consolidate its coin later." - @nopara73 (coinventor of payjoin)
https://nopara73.medium.com/pay-to-endpoint-56eb05d3cac6
1
You are not both inputs, therefore you only pay for your portion of the transaction.
You are wrong. If what you claim were actually implemented, it would create an attack vector where the sender creates a payjoin transaction at a high fee rate and burns the receiver's input.
Don't senders usually pay the fee?
Yes, so the incentive is to "never payjoin" as the sender and "always payjoin" as the receiver.
👍1
No, you pay your fee portion. There's not any more data than your normal transaction.
A payjoin always has at least 2 inputs, and it always consumes more data than a normal transaction.
Its an optional soft fork so since its optional in only some wallets it basically gets no adoption. It must be a protocol requirement for it to be standard, similar to ring-signatures on Monero.
Payjoin isn't a fork. Stop spreading blatant misinformation.
1
Why isn't Payjoin the standard?
Incentive imbalance: Payjoin senders pay mining fees for the receiver.
1❤️1
Someone paid 483k sats in mining fees for a 31k sat output at 6 sat/vbyte 😓
https://mempool.space/tx/9f3ab719ce9e82acd1b3e2470e85960f29cd2f4c967ce450ef0c76c9c28e338b
https://mempool.space/tx/9f3ab719ce9e82acd1b3e2470e85960f29cd2f4c967ce450ef0c76c9c28e338b
Not to be the one to point the big fat fascism-finger again, but the N*zi regime's use of the banking system to persecute its enemies was literally the only reason that Switzerland codified bank secre...
Why did you censor the abbreviation for national socialism?
❤️1
