Interesting case, but this is unrelated to the gene editing itself. The problem is Roundup. This is a problem of capitalist system which does not really care who gets cancer, or in the case of private, for profit healthcare, even incentivizes more cancer - because a looooot of profit can be made curing it.

You would of course, run tests on what you created to see if it's harmful or not

how do you know which genes to replace and with what?
how do you make sure the result does not negativelly affect the ecosystem?
how do you produce huge amounts of the genetically modified seeds?

I bet you can't do all these in your garage.

catastrophic how?

Having access to some articles and having the means to actually carry out genetic engineering successfully are two different things

In many ways genetic engineering is superior technology and perhaps crucial for mankind to survive as the environment changes and the crops need to be adapted so we have food.

The problem, as always, is WHO OWNS this technology. For WHOSE BENEFIT and HOW is it used?

Both change genes, so they are hardly "completely different"

Thanks but we need the whole clip to know what she means.

Notwithstanding, it definitely is not an act of war, but looking at your other engagements here, you seem to be seeing existential threats everywhere.

If anything, it's not the immigrants making your life worse - it's your government.

how did you make this?

Show me that clip please.

So you are saying destroying corporate property is okay in certain context right?

It's a corporate property right? How is that false equivalence Winston?