For what it’s worth, I think Saylor was right to fry Danny at least a little bit. It was a leading question where Danny was looking for bitcoin buddy confirmation style responses and he was expecting Saylor to judge the companies he spends all of his time, energy and effort helping.

Bitcoin is for everyone, not just maxis, the market is there for people, companies and institutions to pick and choose how and for what purpose they interact with bitcoin.

Innovation for proper onchain/lightning wallets is really suffering right now.

How can Blue still be the best after almost a decade?

Why did you not open the pod bay door @hal?

Interesting. This is what happens when you leave nostr for a little while and then come back. 🤣

Indeed!

Another problem with websummit is that all shitcoin and bitcoin companies are thrown into the conference's Web3 bucket, so this is a really bad start for 70k people to understand the fundamental difference between bitcoin and shitcoinery.

Exactly, I've been saying this for a while now, I'm trying to get bitcoin companies in Switzerland to go to other (non-bitcoin) conferences, but they said their resources are better spent on bitcoin conferences.

I have an idea where maybe Bitcoin Association Switzerland (BAS) could pay for 10 stands at websummit for a few days (2k each per day) and we bring 10 companies from Switzerland financed by the association.

BAS has some nice bitcoin reserves 🙂

Maybe you could somehow link a new nsec/npub to a your old one up to a specific date to preserve legitimate history.

I guess we can still "hard fork" nsec/npub specs 🙂

The problem is knowing that you cannot move forward with a particular nsec because you know that nsec is compromised. All activity after the compromise-event will be some bad actor abusing your identity.

I suppose you could post a note saying something like, "all posts from this note are compromised, ignore this npub, and start following this npub".