@nprofile1q... And they're all beautiful. Well done.

@nprofile1q... Its "toxic positivity" on steroids and a conveyor belt, its bad news.

@nprofile1q... I think I may be the wrong person to ask that question because I honestly hate sycophant behaviour so for me a robot sycophant would be even worse. However, I don't think I am the average person so yeah I imagine a lot of people would love a machine telling them they're always right even if they're wrong. That in itself is a problem for our society coupled with AI, this tool is so damn dangerous.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... Considering that AI dependence is a real thing along with AI psychosis? I think it is very comparable.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... There is so much bad that I have a hard time imagining the good ever being worthwhile. Its akin to a pill that has a thousand negative side effects, but you'll feel good for 3 minutes. Why would I roll that die? I can feel good without the side effects that are always present with this pill. I am not at all squeamish about knowing how the sausage is made, I love me some chorizo, I'd rather know what I'm eating though, even if it DOES contain lymph nodes.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... Yeah well I'm not personally insulting you, but your thought process does not make any sense to me. You acknowledge that the tech has lots of negatives, you acknowledge that it hallucinates or outright lies, you acknowledge you have to double check it, you acknowledge how it can be used for nefarious purposes, but none of that seems to really matter because you rely upon it for convenience sake.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... I can only speak for myself. I taught myself critical thinking skills as a child, I have a rigid epistemology as a result. I don't buy anything that is offered up to me so enthusiastically without looking into what is actually happening here.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... I wonder how long there will even be libraries, I'm quite sure that the oligarchs would love to feed all the books to their garbobots and shred them and force everyone to use their bullshit. Frankly I still don't see any good arguments for the use of this shit, sorry. I see a huge stack of cons (not even including the rich) and not many pros.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... The only thing that has essentially changed is you added an extra step where you ask a robot to barf up the stuff rather than asking a search engine.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... What do you think about the law sources it made up that ended up losing someone a court case? I feel like those weren't blog sources. I still feel like its better to actually research the shit you wanna look up on your own than it is to ask a bot to do it and then double check.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... They also notoriously MAKE UP sources though, you can't trust that.

@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... The masses are stupid largely by design.